Daily News Egypt

Dogged determination – a more sober Jan25 - Daily News Egypt

Advertising Area

Advertising Area

Dogged determination – a more sober Jan25

Three years ago, as a friend of mine puts it, everything seemed possible. The 25th of January uprising gave birth to a revolution, and the sky was the limit. Today, as the third anniversary draws close, the promises of Tahrir Square seem distant. Optimism over opportunities is replaced with incredulousness over madness, the inclusive nature of the …

Dr. H.A. Hellyer
Dr. H.A. Hellyer

Three years ago, as a friend of mine puts it, everything seemed possible. The 25th of January uprising gave birth to a revolution, and the sky was the limit. Today, as the third anniversary draws close, the promises of Tahrir Square seem distant. Optimism over opportunities is replaced with incredulousness over madness, the inclusive nature of the revolution’s birth replaced with zero-sum games. Strangely, despair hasn’t set in – but sobriety definitely has.

On the level of quantity, there are certainly more examples of folly and rashness from those who support the military in Egypt. There are far more Egyptians who support that institution than those who oppose it, and they are even more disproportionately represented in the mass media. It is not unusual to see spectacles such as a former member of the Supreme Constitutional Court claim in a television program, for example, that US President Obama’s brother is “one of the architects of investment for the international organisation of the Muslim Brotherhood”. The host asked for clarification – but didn’t call her remarks preposterous. More recently, a journalist and former MP, Mostafa Bakri, on a remarkably popular television program, incited violence against “Americans” en masse, if the US went through with a “plot” to kill General Sisi. The host didn’t seem to be bothered particularly by the claim – or at least did not display any outward sign of it – and certainly the other guest on the programme was simply nodding in agreement.

That is one aspect of the mania and hysteria that occupies what one hopes is on the margins of one side of the political polarisation in Egypt. Less on the margins, of course, are actual court cases and official investigations into various personalities. These included some that were humourous, but rather worrying, such as the investigation called by the public prosecutor into Vodafone for an advertisement. The famous puppet, “Abla Fahita”, was accused by a blogger of sending some sort of “message” to terrorists – rather than ignore the claim for the silliness that it was, the public prosecutor decided to investigate.

The puppet case (who would’ve thought I’d ever write that) probably will not get any further than that (one hopes). Yet, that leaves many other cases. Former MP, and liberal (one of the few that actually exist) politician Amr Hamzawy, is under a travel ban. The basis of it – Hamzawy tweeted last year that a court verdict against NGO workers was shocking, and a transparency lacking. The investigating judge as “defamation of the judiciary” regarded that line. Quite.

But let’s not get ahead of ourselves, and claim that it is only some parts of the pro-military Egyptian elite that might be somewhat surprising. The Muslim Brotherhood and its allies are hardly proud examples of much different. Beyond the sectarian rhetoric against Christians that has never stopped from its official outlets, the messaging continues to be rather removed from reality. Similar to “polls” reported in the summer that indicated the overwhelming majority of Egyptians opposed the removal of Mohammed Morsi (polls which were impossible in the time frame mentioned, and from an organisation few seemed to have ever heard of in the polling industry), another “research study” promoted by Brotherhood supporters surprised us yet again. According to this “study”, 11% of the population came out to vote in the referendum, contrary to the official claim that 38% did. Now, one ought to legitimately call into question the process of the referendum, the fairness of it, and the environment in which it took place. But as yet, none inside of Egypt, other than those affiliated to the Brotherhood and its alliance, question the actual result. Such is the level of popular support for the army – whether one likes it or despises it utterly.

It wouldn’t be the first time the Brotherhood made some general strategic mistakes. In the aftermath of the military ouster of Morsi, the one sector that could be relied upon to hold the new military backed government to account was the human rights and civil rights sector. Indeed, 14 individual organisations signed up to a joint statement on the mass killing of protesters over the course of the past three years – a brave one to issue, considering the repression of dissent from various quarters today. Rather than thank these organisations for standing up for the fundamental rights of all Egyptians, including those that support the Brotherhood, the official website of the Islamist group had a different idea. It carried a statement by the Brotherhood’s political party that stated “such NGOs have become the long arms of Western injustice that strive to eradicate the Islamic identity, discredit Islamist politicians and frustrate their efforts.” Why? Because the statement also took Morsi’s government in 2012-2013 to account, as part of the past three year period. It does not strike me that there is much strategic value in alienating the last non-Islamist sector of society that will protect the fundamental rights of all, including the Brotherhood – but perhaps I missed something.

The reality of all of this is clear. The “zero-sum” nature of this current political crisis, which has already taken hundreds upon hundreds of lives and led to thousands of arrests and truly damaging social polarisation, sees no sign of being drawn back. On the contrary, it seems the main protagonists are actually quite comfortable in this zone where everyone but your close allies must be the enemy.

It is, indeed, a far cry from the promise of that square in downtown Cairo, three years ago. Somehow, though, despair fails to creep in. I wrote to one of those charged recently, and he replied to me, “I’ll continue to defend the values of human rights and freedoms. I’ll continue to write and say what I believe in, in spite of the fact that my space is shrinking.” They’ve lost their hope the revolution will bring widespread change in the next decade – perhaps not even in this generation. But journalists, activists and human rights defenders, draw on a seemingly endless supply of determination to continue. Optimism does not really seem to come into it anymore – now, it’s simply a dogged, instinctive resolve to reject despondency.

Hope hasn’t been replaced by despair. Instead, it’s just become more sober. Those who truly supported the 25 January Revolution in 2011 and didn’t turn to partisan self-interest know what they’re up against – and they know how few friends they now have. The best of them, though, know that actually, they always had few friends, and that it was never about popularity – it was about what was right. It still is. It always will be.

Advertising Area

Advertising Area

  • Pingback: Despair is betrayal: a more sober Jan25 | News-Connect.com()

  • sam enslow

    People with small discuss other people. People with good minds discuss events. People with great minds discuss ideas.
    The irresponsible Egyptian media (and their sponsors) are causing great harm to Egypt. They make Fox News actually seem to provide “fair and balanced” reporting – even though that network went to court and won the right to lie. The end results of their “reporting” is that, judging from coffee shop conversations, no one believes them. Their antics also have made it so no one trusts the government, especially since it is believed the government is controlling the media. Facts change on an hourly basis and are constantly twisted to serve political agendas. I agree no one should trust the government. It must be watched, but the press here doesn’t watch. It either praises or condemns. Investigative reporting is non-existent, sources are not important. Rumors are reported as fact.
    I am not “hurt” by the anti-American sentiments prevalent in the Egyptian media. However, the claims, such as those mention in this article, ignore facts, especially the fact that all candidates for President of the United States are investigated by both the FBI and CIA and by the opposing party. There are no laws protecting public officials from investigation (look at Nixon and Clinton) or insult (in the US, it is an art form). public figures. The adverse effects of these “accounts” is that they harm Egypt’s reputation in countries that harbor only good will toward Egypt and its people. There is no reason, no benefit, for any country to want a weak Egypt. In politics, always ask, “Who benefits?”
    But Egypt’s media wants drama as is the case in all countries. But it seldom discusses ideas. Character assassinations are its stock in trade. Just look at the attacks historically that have been made against El Baradei and Mussa. One day they are heroes. The next day they are villains. The reasoning behind these men’s decisions are not discussed. People who have worked and earned honorable reputations, even if their positions are unpopular, are hounded by the media. Meanwhile those who were ousted by the 25 January Revolution are now hailed as saints. It makes one wonder why there was a revolution at all. Honorable men can disagree. Often the truth is somewhere between stated positions. Compromises are reached, but this is impossible when the media concentrates on personalities and not ideas.

  • Pingback: Dogged Determination – A More Sober Jan25 [Daily News Egypt] | Dr H.A. Hellyer د. إتش()

  • Pingback: Links to latest articles and distribution list | Dr H.A. Hellyer د. إتش()

Breaking News

No current breaking news

Daily News Egypt Android App Available for free download on Google play
Daily News Egypt Ios App Available for free download on APP Store