Home
Loading...
You are here:  Home  >  Opinion  >  Current Article

Pity Sawiris

  /   1 Comment   /   1203 Views

Farah Halime

Farah Halime

At a time when many Egyptian workers are protesting against the chief executives of companies demanding better rights, employees at Orascom Construction Industries demonstrated an unusual display of loyalty against accusations from the government that the company owes EGP 14bn ($2.1bn) in back taxes relating to the 2007 sale of its cement arm to France’s Lafarge.

Hundreds of protesters gathered outside the company’s Cairo headquarters last week holding banners saying: “Oh Finance Minister, where is social justice?”, “Bread, Freedom, Sawiris is not a tax evader,” and “100,000 families will lose their income,” Bloomberg reported.

Poor Nassef Sawiris, OCI’s billionaire chairman who is worth $6.5bn and runs the most valuable publicly traded company in Egypt…

Both Nassef and his tycoon father Onsi, who are out of the country, have been placed on an arrivals watchlist related to the tax evasion charge meaning they could be arrested if they return to Egypt.  There’s little chance that they’ll be flying back to Cairo anytime soon.

Yes, this case has prompted the country’s business community to decry the move against OCI as another example of the government choking off much-needed investment and using its power to strike at liberal opponents (Nassef’s brother Naguib is a founder of the Free Egyptians party, a fierce critic of the Brotherhood).

But the reality is, companies will always outsmart governments and OCI did just that. That’s how Wall Street escaped regulators for so long and why white collar crimes are often only discovered years after the offence.

In Egypt, where financial watchdogs are absent and regulators are toothless, OCI’s really only guilty of using legal loopholes to evade tax. And that’s not illegal.

OCI has repeatedly denied that it broke any laws and says it owes a much smaller sum of EGP 4.7bn.

The bigger story is that it is likely that the cement business OCI sold in 2007 did so well (and had such a high valuation) by exploiting energy subsidies to industries. The company grew quickly by using cheap fuel meant for the poor and then sold the business when it was at its peak.  The deal, then valued at EUR 8bn, was the largest ever in the history of the stock exchange, the FT reports.

The truth is tax evasion is widespread in Egypt because of the complicated and largely ineffective collection system. Employers have developed a number of strategies to spare themselves the grief of wading through Egyptian tax law. For example, many foreign workers are paid in cashable cheques or employed as advisors and consultants, leaving the responsibility of tax payments to the employee himself. Usually the government doesn’t chase you up unless you earn over a certain amount.

What is more, Egypt regularly misses tax collection targets. In the budget for the country’s 2010/11 financial year, the revenue target was EGP 200bn. Only EGP 192bn was collected. Again, for the 2011/2012 fiscal year the tax revenue target stood at EGP 232bn, but the government only raised EGP 170bn.

This financial year, the government has set an ambitious goal of collecting EGP 260bn, but considering the Morsi administration’s track record, this is unlikely to be fulfilled.

OCI have the upper hand. They are well-versed in the legalities of their case, better so than the fumbling, muddled lawyers working for the government.

Nassef is by all means an important businessman and his conglomerate employs many thousands of Egyptians, but he is also not the victim his lawyers make him out to beHis businesses thrived on the labour of Egyptians and subsidies on fuel from the government. It would be wrong for the government to file baseless accusations against OCI, but the company’s clever “tax avoidance” should not be applauded either.

As the Tax Justice Network writes in its manifesto: “Tax is the most sustainable source of finance for development. The long-term goal of poor countries must be to replace foreign aid dependency with tax self-sufficiency.”

Egypt’s precarious financial situation is not just related to inefficiency and bad governance. The tycoons of the pre-revolutionary period are also to blame. Using their government connections, they helped push through laws that were ideal for growing their personal wealth and not for increasing the income of everyday Egyptians. Nassef himself was a board member of the Egyptian Centre for Economic Studies, which as the Washington Post explained in 2011, helped write the laws that led to Egypt’s privatisation spree. Fellow board members included Ahmed Ezz and Gamal Mubarak, among others.

Unfortunately, the political battles have relegated this debate to the side, but whether you like the government or not, increasing the tax base is important for Egypt to get back on track. One part of this is to put in place better laws that prevent billionaires from paying only a pittance on multi-billion dollar deals.

  • Vivian

    hmn. Privatation isn’t a bad thing. In fact, privatization is exactley what egypt’s over inflated public sector needs right now. (Just not privatization in favour of Qatar). Yet you make it look like a bad thing. Yes it benefits companies, but it also encourages innovation which raises standards of living. You make privatization sound like a crime.


You might also like...

James M. Dorsey

Egyptian campuses and football emerge as flashpoint in resistance to President Al-Sisi

Read More →