Daily News Egypt

When will the west pay the price for its support of political Islam in the Arab world? - Daily News Egypt

Advertising Area

Advertising Area

When will the west pay the price for its support of political Islam in the Arab world?

History confirms that the relationship between the west and the Muslim Brotherhood is not a recent phenomenon, but rather has existed since the organisation was created. During the British Occupation, the Suez Canal Company provided financial support to Hassan Al-Banna and other local parties in an attempt to counter the influence of the Wafd, who …

Farid Zahran
Farid Zahran

History confirms that the relationship between the west and the Muslim Brotherhood is not a recent phenomenon, but rather has existed since the organisation was created. During the British Occupation, the Suez Canal Company provided financial support to Hassan Al-Banna and other local parties in an attempt to counter the influence of the Wafd, who at the time led Egypt’s national struggle for independence.

After the July 1952 revolution, the Muslim Brotherhood’s relationship with Gamal Abdel Nasser and the Free Officer’s movement deteriorated specifically as a result of the latter’s policy of non-alignment, which was hostile to western neo-colonialism.

The Muslim Brotherhood only later entered into an alliance with Anwar Sadat, after he began to sever his ties with the Soviet Union and move into the western sphere of influence. Even when the United States supported the Mubarak regime, they always maintained their affinity with political Islamists and the Muslim Brotherhood in particular.

It is no longer a secret that the west has, and continues, to support the Muslim Brotherhood’s claim to power, the only difference being that now such support is framed in the context of simply recognising a democratically elected leader chosen by his people.

As the Arabic saying goes, “if someone wants to eat shit, get him a spoon”. All the evidence points to the fact that the Muslim Brotherhood would never have been able to stay in power without the continued support of the US and other European countries.

The west’s support for the Muslim Brotherhood (particularly in recent years) has shocked many middle and upper class Egyptians who see a contradiction in the west’s purported advocacy for democracy and human rights, and the Muslim Brotherhood’s borderline fascist religious rhetoric.

Questions surrounding the west’s disposition towards the Muslim Brotherhood became more pronounced after the White House released statements saying that issues regarding the legality of President Mohamed Morsy’s constitutional declaration were an internal, Egyptian matter, and would not elicit any direct criticism from the US.

An acquaintance of mine recently spent time with a European diplomat who informed him that Europe’s position regarding the Muslim Brotherhood and Morsy would be to continue to support them due to their importance in helping to preserve regional stability in the Middle East. Morsy’s recent success in brokering a temporary cease fire between Israel and Hamas helped solidify his reputation as a capable leader who could be counted on to help de-escalate tensions in the region.

The Muslim Brotherhood has been careful to present themselves to the west as strong leaders who are not only capable of brokering ceasefires, but also being able to play politics by accepting World Bank loans after opposing the idea only months before during the Ganzuri administration. Being able to raise the price of basic goods amid a crippling recession and force the issue of the constitution and its referendum onto a people who have opposed it every step of the way demonstrates the strength of the Brotherhood and their ability to push forth their agenda regardless of the circumstances.

I am convinced that the timing of these decisions was determined by the World Bank rather than the Muslim Brotherhood, as part of a broader push by the former to implement their programme of economic reform, regardless of the interests of the Egyptian people. Naturally, the Muslim Brotherhood is confident in its ability to push forth any economic program, and so they will. They may also fear that not pushing through these reforms may make them seem weak and unable to protect the western interests in Egypt.

In the interest of protecting Israel’s security, and implementing their broader programme of economic reform, the west has once again compromised its values, ignoring Morsy’s constitutional declaration that crowns him the new dictator, putting an end to Egypt’s independent judiciary.

Why is the west so keen on implementing this programme of economic reform that will increase the burden on Egypt’s poor while opposing plans to utilise the country’s natural resources in the interest of real development, that which is rooted in strengthening Egypt’s health and education sectors? Why does the west insist with such stubbornness on supporting the propagation of Mubarak era policies that will only widen the divide between rich and poor?

Why do they refuse to support democratic organisations that have been living in a state of constant repression since 1952? Why does the west prop up the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt in an attempt to ensure that Israel remains safe from Hamas’ rockets? Do they not know that Hamas represents the Muslim Brotherhood in Palestine, and that they are one in the same? Is Israel’s security worth sacrificing the whole of Egypt to a regime fundamentally hostile to the ideas of democracy and human rights? What is the west’s real interest in Israel and how is it more valuable than the entire Arab world? What has Israel ever done for the west?

It goes without saying that the Muslim Brotherhood is a fascist organisation that is able to govern the country and push forth its agenda in a way that Egypt’s traditional elite was unable to. The west sees fascism in Egypt as their only option, however in reality it is they who have made it so.

In this case, the west has chosen the religious wing of fascism to serve as its agent, as they are the ones most likely to support the propagation of a conservative, reactionary agenda. However the Muslim Brotherhood is also a ticking time bomb, one that could potentially explode and shatter the west’s iron grip on the region.

The west continues to think of Egypt in traditional colonial terms, and for that reason supports conservative, reactionary regimes on the condition that they help preserve the west’s strategic interests, regardless as to which particular methods of repression they choose to use. However what the west does not understand is that religious fascist organisations feed off each other, and if allowed to propagate will eventually spawn an entity that will inevitably turn its aggression towards the west itself, labelling it the Great Satan and the source of all corruption in the world.

This will all happen despite the fact that it was the west that provided them with support and enabled them to successfully rise to power. The wheeling and dealing of western financial institutions will have all been for nothing except to help contribute to the rise of an entity fundamentally hostile to them as a civilisation, rooted in the writings of Sayyid Qutb and others.

The west, and the US in particular, has already paid the price for its alliance with the Mujahedeen in Afghanistan against the Soviet Union, so when will it pay the price for propping up political Islam in the Arab world? I think not long, as the death of the American ambassador in Libya was just the first of many acts of retribution soon to be witnessed in the west.

However I think that it will be in Europe, with its large Muslim population ripe for recruitment by radical, Islamist organisations, where the ultimate price will be paid, rather than in the US.

However the most painful act of retribution will most likely come from the people of the region themselves, who see the west as the bankrollers of these fascist organisations who are trying to rebuild the repressive regimes of the past, only this time with a religious hue.

Advertising Area

Advertising Area

  • thisoldgov.com

    Christian Democrats (Ger), Christian Republicans (US), Muslim Brotherhood (Egypt/etc.) operate as right-wing political parties wrapped in pseudo-religion: they don’t represent the people, the religion or God.

    Look beyond the veils to the interests in power. To Caesar, Caesar’s, but only that and nothing more. The prophets agree.

    Persecution is not an original feature in any religion except religions established by law. Thomas Paine 1791

  • bob anderson

    This,well written summary of the past,present and future of Arab-and the West should be preserved and advertised. Thank you for the wisdom. I do not believe that portions of the West will survive if dedicated,extreme Muslims get the nuclear bomb. Sadly, there will be suffering that the world has never experienced when the bomb is used as advertised. Realistically, there is very little hope. Right now, the West is dreaming an unrealistic dream.
    Again, thank you for the wisdom,Farid

  • Hassan Muhamed

    Lots of gross generalizations with few facts.

    To say that the West has in recent years supported the Muslim Brotherdhood is ludicrous.

    The West fears political Islam.

    Where are your verifiable facts?

  • A. E.

    Accurate and insightful article, nothing good can possibly come from the MB, as they do NOT have the interests of the Egyptian people at hand, only their own agenda, which is buried deep in their own draconian and stifling version of Islam.

  • Dr. Reda Sobky

    Yes, it is very unfortunate but the US powers that be do not understand what they are getting themselves into. When Mussolini took power he also had a majority and so did most communist regimes, especially when it is rigged. I am not sure where that comes from except that it is tinged with old style orientalism. They want a dictator, maybe they should then the trains will run on time. In truth, I am ashamed of Obama and Hillary for exhibiting such bad judgment in this matter. I guess the US policy makers of the fifties who helped screw up america’s relations in the middle east for fifty years are at it again. New faces, but same old, same old patronizing attitudes with bad results later when they are both long gone. I guess their children will have to deal with it when it gets to crises level again. Mubarak now Morsi.

  • kmansfield

    The author has been listening to the rhetoric and propaganda. America doesn’t stand for democracy but fake illiberal democracy. It pushes democracy to get it’s own puppets into power without war.
    The greed of our elites is a sickness, an addiction. That is American Government’s only value. Worshipping mammon and free market capitalism have taken over.
    Foreign policy realists are not in power, the globalist neoliberals are. http://www.au.af.mil/au/ssq/2011/fall/forsyth.pdf
    IMF and World Bank loans are the signal to NATO that Morsi is willing to enslave Egyptians to the west’s private capital interests just like Mubarak did, as long as he’s on top.

    Stop listening to the vapid speeches and look at what they do. Politicians are blood drenched liars.

    • Dr. Reda Sobky

      It is hard to understand how such an obvious lesson is not learned. Now an unbalanced religiously fanatical situation has been hatched in Egypt which is now heading towards Iranization. Will this not threaten the West very soon. The Emarty and Saoudi money is financing the take over of Egypt and turning into their playground and cannon fodder to confront the mounting Shia rivalry. Inevitably with Hamas (MB branch in Ghaza) needing gains and subject to Morsi, he will have an escalation trigger anytime he wants to. As an American can’t understand why my fellow American countrymen are so effective at so many things but when it comes to Foreign Policy watch out…if there is an error that can be made we will make it and its OK so long as the consequences come after the group is gone, so we trash them in retrospect. So each generation spends its time sacrificing the best and brightest and wasting its energy and resources containing the disasters their predecessors helped create. Look at all what we had to eat in Iraq and Afghanistan, will your children not have to deal with this continuing disaster in the future? Welcome to Egypt the new disaster you are helping create by ignoring your own ethics and principles for expedient means and don’t say I didn’t know it was going to be so bad because legions are telling you so now in real time.

  • Kelly R.

    Wow, when the US gets too involved everyone screams and yells and calls foul on the bully, but when the US tries to keep their hands off everyone screams and yells and calls foul on the bully. Make up your minds.

  • Stephanie

    Please remember that the “west” refers to the LEADERSHIP of these nations. We the people have no influence at all when it comes to our foreign policy, and many in the US think it is a disgrace. There are forces at work that are beyond the common man. Most important is for the people to realize–in whatever nation they reside–that they are together, one and the same, and have very little ability to affect a change on a world stage.

    As someone who has long loved Egypt, I watch with a broken heart as the new government of Egypt devalues me as a woman and as an agnostic. But I know I can’t blame the people of Egypt. I can only hope that they demand religious freedom and gender equality.

    And please don’t let the facists destroy the legacy left from your ancient ancestors, as we read reports here about wild-eyed fanatics wanting to destroy the pyramids in some bizzare attempt to “protect” God from “offense”. Never mind that the pyramids have stood for thousands of years, and God did not see fit to send an earthquake….. I see very little religious devotion in these acts, very little Godliness, but rather a lust for power hidded under the cloak of devotion.

  • Dr. Reda Sobky

    The USA is the leading power in the world and therefore its weight is felt and it should be involved. However, the nature of the involvement, its tenets and attitude makes so much difference, we are all eager to see an involvement that is fair and effective and promotes policies that actually help Egypt through this difficult period. Yes, why can’t the US be consistent in applying prodemocratic policies? Obama could be calling Morsi to push him towards moderation and inclusion. What’s wrong with giving an opinion that Egyptians are worthy of constitutional protections equivalent to what you enjoy as a US citizens? It is because Egyptians hold Americans in high regard that more is expected.

  • Mona

    Very very much true .. Muslim Brotherhood can’t be trusted at all.. American gov. Thinks they are in control ..but the truth is far from real as once they r in full control they will hit back at the west .. That they call the Satan world … And time will show…

Breaking News

No current breaking news

Daily News Egypt Android App Available for free download on Google play
Daily News Egypt Ios App Available for free download on APP Store