Daily News Egypt

Experts – a Threatened Species? - Daily News Egypt

Advertising Area

Advertising Area

Experts – a Threatened Species?

An expert is not defined by his ability to predict or answer a question but actually ask the right questions

By Hermann Wimmer

In the midst of consistent upgrades to existing technology that is seen as many to make our lives easier we often get asked if all this automation will eventually impact our view and need of whom we today call “experts”? Will the future be an era of agile generalists who can play every role, supported by data-driven decisions?

Data journalist Nate Silver, who was part of a panel discussion at Teradata Universe this April, surprised his listeners with an opening statement that was quite humble for a data journalist. He said that data is not magic and there is a considerable risk of using them inappropriately because, as he put it, “we’re all dumber than we think we are”. Predictions often fail, simply because fitting a data set is not the same as predicting future developments

For example, in the case of chronic diseases people often turn to the web not because they’re actually ill but actually because of all the media reporting on the subject. We have also seen situations where business specialists might commission data scientists to do technically sophisticated analyses and then come back with hardly surprising results like “people are more likely to buy warm boots in winter”.

Maybe we should then differentiate between self-proclaimed experts who mainly use data to justify their existing opinions, and experts who truly have expertise and use data to form their opinion and improve their decisions. The question then arises if the problem lies in the human race? Should we just step aside and let the data take all decisions? The answer again is no.

The question is whether data scientists did their homework properly in the first place: providing excellent data quality and the right analytic and predictive models. Because the old term ‘garbage in-garbage out’ remains valid and big data increases its relevance by orders of magnitude.

A good data scientist is someone who masters the art of designing experiments accurately and sticks to measurement rather than assumptions. He sees the dotcoms at the frontline of this new experimentation era with a daring attitude of simply trying everything

In a nutshell: once you have the right question, finding the right answer is easy. Well, it of course still depends on the technology you use. A good data scientist and a good journalist have one thing in common: their profession is mainly about finding the right question. And never forget that throwing a bunch of numbers at a decision-maker might not be enough to convince him. You need to be able to bring the data to life.

Hermann Wimmer is the International President of Teradata Corporation



Advertising Area

Advertising Area

  • Pingback: Experts – a Threatened Species? - Egypt()

  • Great subject and I think the power of prediction should be emphasized as science gives us great predictive power, for example medical science allows doctors to predictably set bones. Automobiles today are a much more predictable form of transportation than before as science and technology improved. Truly expert knowledge expands zones of predictability which is the true test.

    So people claiming expertise MUST be challenged as to their predictive value and their predictions checked. The problem I think is many people may get confused about the word “prediction” giving it mystical overtones but my point is that correct expertise removes the mysticism, and gives stunning accuracy.

    Today we can predict with near 100% certainty how radio waves will travel, allowing us to communicate with space probes flying through the vastness of space.

    We can predictably put vast mountains of metal filled with people into the air with such a routine regularity that most people take air travel for granted.

    Science quite simply expands zones of prediction and true expertise is demonstrated by saying something will work, and then it actually working.

  • Al Masry

    Miss understanding. Similar to chemists who use dyes, etc. to identify a chemical reactions, biologists (living organism scientists) use a living organisms to indicate the healthy environment.. They may chose a frog, an owl, or a worm, etc. that will tell the condition of living organism as a whole. Some people may say, “Who care about a worm?” It is wrong because the presence of healthy worm tells the presence of healthy soil for plants, …, and even us.

Breaking News

No current breaking news

Daily News Egypt Android App Available for free download on Google play
Daily News Egypt Ios App Available for free download on APP Store