Home
Loading...
You are here:  Home  >  Opinion  >  Current Article

The untouchable old guard

  /   2 Comments   /   966 Views

Some keep saying that the “third hand” has disappeared with the ascendency of the Muslim Brotherhood to power. I find it funny when people say that.

    Print       Email
Managing editor Rana Allam

Rana Allam

Just last week, we were having a proper fight. The constitution battle. We have been at it for weeks and almost every day some progress in awareness and mobilisation was being made. With the little disasters in every corner of this country, and the failures associated with them, acceptance of the status quo was not in question anymore. The constitution battle was being won

In a matter of days, the whole situation was turned upside down, with acquittals in the Battle of the Camel trial, Friday’s clashes and who was where doing what, the attorney general  he said/she said drama, the incredible statements of the Brotherhood and Mekki… and on and on it goes. In just a matter of days the constitution battle has subsided, but rest assured, it will be back.

For now, we are somewhere else, having street fights. For now, the only recurring thought in my mind is the names on the list of acquittals from the Battle of the Camel trial.

The first time I heard the name Ibrahim Kamel was on a list of members of the Egypt/US Presidential Council back in 1996. I was a junior reporter and took a few months off to work on a USAID project in preparation for the MENA economic conference held in Cairo.  Our job was to assist in logistics and PR for the US/Egypt presidents’ council. This council was a business council reporting directly to the president of Egypt and the vice president of the United States. It was comprised of 15 Egyptian businessmen, bankers, and investment lawyers and 15 US counterparts.

Formed in 1994, the council had a five-member executive committee on both sides. The chairman of the Egyptian side was Ibrahim Kamel and the committee included Gamal Mubarak among other very high profile figures. Of the members of the Council was Mohamed AbulEnein, another acquitted defendant in the Battle of the Camel trial. The council was the initiator/adviser/implementer of Egypt’s economy, businesses, taxes, investment laws, business litigation laws, et cetera. They had projects and they acted as counsellors for both governments on how to handle the Egyptian economy and businesses. During the conference, they presented new laws and measures for Egypt to “move forward” with its economy. That was when it all began, when the trip downhill started; the mid 1990s.

Gamal Mubarak was just stepping into Egypt’s limelight, the president’s bachelor banker son back from abroad. And for most of us back then, Ibrahim Kamel was a ghost, the most important name on the list of members, yet completely unknown to the average Egyptian. We knew the other names, at least by connection to some business. For most Egyptians, the name Ibrahim Kamel means nothing, because the stronger ones always remain in the dark, like the late Omar Suleiman for example. Kamel was the chairman of that council, he was the direct adviser to Mubarak in matters of money, at least with the US.

Some keep saying that the “third hand” has disappeared with the ascendency of the Muslim Brotherhood to power. I find it funny when people say that. The National Democratic Party, much like the Muslim Brotherhood, is not about papers and documents and headquarters. The decision to dissolve the NDP is as useless as a decision to dissolve the MB. The NDP is a group of businesses backed by politicians, but mostly by local authorities and small employees. Those who, even on a very small scale, benefited from that mode of bribery and alliances are still there and will continue fighting. This cannot be dissolved by a court ruling.

The Battle of the Camel defendants were almost all NDP leaders, and Mubarak’s old guard could not have stayed in jail, at least not yet. They are still managing the day-to-day running of the country and our current rulers know that. Gamal’s people, which includes Ahmed Ezz and Nazif and the rest of that bunch, were the smaller links in the chain of power and so became scapegoats, but the untouchables will remain so, at least for a while. They are the ones holding Egypt’s economy, international business relations and the hundreds of billions of dollars that move and shake our daily lives.

Now the question is, what kind of deal has Morsy and his Brothers forged to sort this mess?

About the author

Rana Allam

Rana Allam

Rana is the Daily News Egypt managing editor. You can follow her @Run_Rana

  • Hussein Gohar

    ……and Mubarak’s old guard could not have stayed in jail, at least not yet…….I hope they will be there joined by those who are dealing with them. Time will tell about the forged deal, hopefully it won’t take long. Thank you for posing the question.

  • IS

    Hi Rana, while I doubt you take the time to read such comments, I am nonetheless throwing this out and hoping. Your article touched a nerve – both on an ideological level and a personal one.

    First off, I commend you on maintaining the spirit of the revolution, yet I do have a few points that, albeit against my nature, I feel obliged to highlight.

    I hate to be so blunt, but the article (opinion piece) above is lacking any form of factual representations of events/individuals and their actions. Excuse me for expecting more substance backing the opinions presented when reading an article from a ‘journalistic’ source. How is a reader meant to take on a story that involved no events (other than your involvement at junior capacity with a USAID project in 1996) to form any opinion on your argument? I’m sure if you re-read the article you’ll notice there’s absolutely no fact-base backing any of the incessant namedropping.

    Now, on a slightly more specific matter, it truly saddens me to continue to see/hear people jumping on whatever bandwagon is being pushed through town at any point in time. Revolutions are, in effect, built through this group think/snowballing process. But, since Jan 25th, it appears that people – non-MB supporters specifically – have jumped on the ‘always contrarian’ bandwagon. That unfortunately extended to assuming that all current decisions have been corrupted – even now, as ‘el shaab’ is looking over every shoulder. All this without even giving a seconds thought to the number of false accusations that were generated during the first month of the revolution and the number of falsely accused who have suffered the consequences ever since.

    So, rather than trying to find the ‘real’ wrong-doer, the approach is now: if so-and-so were mentioned at the time, then it HAS to stick (after all it’s easier right?). Excuse my naivety, but WHY exactly must accusations drawn up mid-revolution by unknown/mysterious sources be accurate? Why are we so actively dismissing legislative proceedings that extended for over a year? Why is it that society is so easy to see ‘false-flag’ operations only when it suits their ‘beliefs’ – beliefs which, if I’m to be a realist, are as clouded as can be by manipulation from every which political direction/agenda?

    To that same extent, I ask, why must your views on the catalysts to the collapse of Egypt be so true when there is nothing to go by? Do you, truly believe that everyone involved in government was corrupt and looking out for ‘number one’? I for one am certain that there were several individuals who lived their lives and spent their effort towards the development of this nation who also had the experience necessary to make it succeed. That is not to say that there were no opposing forces that often had the upper hand.

    As such, I strongly urge you to spend more effort into researching the individuals you so freely implicate rather than simply restating what’s reported by other (frivolous) news sources and adding your twist to them (in this case “1996” and your distant assessment of 1990 onwards… really?).

    It’s been 20 months. We’re all tired. Injustice has been rife. So please, let’s just try to be fair at this point. That’s all we’ve got left to work for. It won’t happen if we don’t look into matters with a little more objective thought and less bias. That often includes rethinking what we think we know – or should I say – what we’ve been told.

    _________________

    On a side note: The points you raised in your first paragraphs are rather key and it’s sad to see them sidestepped in favour of detracting events that are (always) so well timed.

    Please accept my apologies if anything came off harsh but, as I’m sure you can tell, this was passion driven out of a very personal matter, yet I did not want to come off in defence of a single individual as I’m sure there are many others out there deserving of the same stance.

    I only hope this reaches you (and other readers) and gauges your thoughts at some level.

You might also like...

Ziad Akl

Egypt: Re-thinking political parties

Read More →